This research aims to analyze the implementation of tender activities for the procurement of government goods and services using e-procurement and the inhibiting factors that influence the implementation of tender activities for the procurement of government goods and services using e-procurement. The research was carried out in the goods and services procurement section of the Regional Secretariat of Kutai Kartanegara Regency. Data was collected through key informants determined purposefully. The data collected is in the form of primary and secondary data. Data collection was carried out through interviews, observation, and literature study. The analytical tool used is qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the research are 1) communication has gone well, carried out formally and informally; the transmission dimension is carried out well, referring to standard operating procedures (SOP), the clarity dimension is clear, the consistency dimension is running well, 2) The staff resources of this section are still inadequate with the existing workload; information is running optimally, authority has been exercised well in implementing this policy, the facilities provided to users are adequate, 3) the disposition has gone well, consisting of: the implementer’s attitude in carrying out his duties has gone well, incentives have been provided and are adequate, 4) the bureaucratic structure is running well, consisting of; already has an SOP and its implementation has referred to the SOP, and fragmentation has been carried out in accordance with the provisions, 5) efficiency factors have run efficiently, effectiveness factors have run effectively, 6) accountable factors can be accounted for (accountable factors have operated very openly). Factors inhibiting the implementation of e-procurement-based government goods and services procurement tender activities are: 1) staff (Human Resources/HR), 2) electricity supply problems, 3) unstable internet quality system problems, 4) provider negligence goods or services, and 5) lack of local providers.